A political tug-of-war over clean air

February 5th, 2012

 

To wrap up The Arizona Republic’s series “The Air We Breathe,” Shaun McKinnon will answer questions about local pollution, its effects, and what’s being done to address the problem. The chat will be held on Feb. 6, from noon-1 p.m., at azcentral.com

By Shaun McKinnon

(Last in a series)

In February 1998, the Governor’s Air Quality Strategies Task Force delivered to Gov. Jane Dee Hull a thick report recommending actions that could reduce levels of ozone, carbon monoxide and dust particulates in metropolitan Phoenix.

Some of the recommendations were enacted, such as requiring cleaner-burning gasoline during the winter months and cleaner-burning fireplaces in new homes. Other ideas were rejected, such as a pollution tax to pay for dust reduction or limits on gas-powered landscaping equipment.

Nearly 14 years later, the task-force report remains the last attempt to address air quality in Arizona with comprehensive, forward-looking proposals.

Since then, state and local agencies have acted almost exclusively in response to deadlines and threats from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which enforces the Clean Air Act. Almost every new law or ordinance related to air quality has been adopted to satisfy an EPA rule.

Almost nothing has happened to address the threat of traffic-related pollution sources along major roads and freeways or to help children or adults with respiratory illnesses aggravated by air pollution.

More: 

Related:

[EDITORIAL] Growth plans must take aim at pollution 

Bookmark and Share

Lenders battle over Marriott Starr Pass in Tucson

February 5th, 2012

 

A sale under the uniform commercial code has become a new tactic used by mezzanine lenders to take over commercial properties and jump ahead of a senior lender when time comes to collect the debt

By Dale Quinn

Arizona Daily Star

Marriott Starr Pass in Tucson

An auction on the JW Marriott Starr Pass Resort & Spa, originally scheduled for Thursday, has been pushed to March 2.

Last fall, the company that owns the massive resort, which sits in the rocky slopes of the Tucson Mountains west of downtown, defaulted on a $145 million loan recorded in August 2006.

Starr Pass Resort Developments, the owner, took on the debt before the real estate bubble burst and the property, which opened in 2005, was only just getting its footing when business and leisure travel screeched to a near halt.

Christopher Ansley, who developed the property, found himself unable to pay the debt, and on Oct. 12, lender U.S. Bank National Association notified him of plans to initiate the foreclosure process.

More: 

Bookmark and Share

Wyoming veterinarian gives horses 2nd chance with artificial limbs

February 5th, 2012

 

Sammy recovers at the Sheridan Equine Hospital after undergoing amputation and limb-replacement surgery. Sammy had a life-threatening joint infection. / Provided by Ted Vlahos

Horses fitted with prostheses don’t have the “luxury” of lengthy, staged recovery and time is generally not on their side

By Martin Kidston

Billings Gazette

CODY, Wyo. — The steel rods are clear in the X-ray, standing out as solid pins penetrating the milky white outline of bone. What’s not so clear in the image is that the owner of the leg is a horse that received a second chance at life.

Veterinarian Ted Vlahos pulls down the image and considers his work. He’s in the business of giving second chances, and has pioneered a field of veterinary medicine that didn’t exist too long ago.

“It was around the time the Iraq war started and I had a horse that needed an artificial limb,” Vlahos said Tuesday at the Cody Equine Hospital. “With hundreds of guys and gals coming back from the war missing limbs, I decided to modify some of the human protocols for the horse.”

Attempts to fit horses with artificial limbs go back roughly 40 years. Vlahos credits a small group of veterinary surgeons for advancing amputation and limb replacement in horses to the point where it’s now a viable option.

More: 

Bookmark and Share

Florence mine critics tweet their discontent

February 4th, 2012

 

“Sulphuric acid does not equal lemon juice,” said one of the messages from the anti-mining group, which represents Southwest Value Partners

By Ryan Randazzo – Feb. 4, 2012 05:46 PM

The Arizona Republic

The public-relations team representing homebuilders in the Florence area who are trying to stop a copper mine near town went on a Twitter assault recently to bash the mine.

Curis Resources Inc., a division of Canadian mining company Hunter Dickinson Inc., plans to mine the copper with pumps that send acid underground to dissolve the copper minerals, then suck the liquid and copper back to the surface.

But companies with plans to build homes around the mine site, which is directly north of the town and in the middle of acres of master-planned communities, worry the mine will contaminate groundwater.

Curis President/CEO Michael McPhie went on Channel 8 “Arizona Horizon” last week and the anti-mining group Protect Our Water Our Future sent 20 messages over Twitter to respond to the mining company’s statements.

McPhie described “very weak vinegar, lemon-juice strength” acid the company plans to use.

More: 

 

Bookmark and Share

Arizona pension law ruled unconstitutional

February 4th, 2012

Employees’ contributions to system rose from 50% to 53%

By Michael Kiefer – Feb. 3, 2012 09:56 PM

The Arizona Republic

A Maricopa County Superior Court judge has ruled that a law changing the contribution that state employees make to their pension funds is unconstitutional.

Senate Bill 1614 went into effect July 1, increasing the percentage of employees’ contributions to the Arizona State Retirement System from 50 percent to 53 percent.

It was a cost-cutting move, intended to cut $60 million from the state budget. But seven schoolteachers sued.

Judge Eileen Willett noted in her ruling that the state Constitution describes the public retirement system as a contractual relationship between the state and its employees and that state statutes forbid laws “impairing the obligation of a contract.”

“When the plaintiffs were hired as teachers, they entered a contractual relationship with the State regarding the public retirement system of which they became members,” Willett wrote. “Their retirement benefits were a valuable part of the consideration offered by their employers upon which the teachers relied when accepting employment.”

More: http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/2012/02/03/20120203arizona-pension-law-ruled-unconstitutional.html

Bookmark and Share

Looking into how the Supreme Court might rule on Obamacare

February 4th, 2012

 

Professor: ‘I just have the sense that Roberts will go in to find a way to uphold the law, but in a way that narrows’

The Huffington Post

A Kaiser Family Foundation poll published as the Supreme Court went into mid-term recess last week reveals that nearly 60 percent of Americans think the justices will be guided by ideology rather than legal analysis when they decide the constitutionality of Affordable Care Act’s controversial individual mandate requiring people to purchase health insurance.

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts

But in the first half of this term, the Court has shown more nuanced considerations, suggesting conservatives — including Chief Justice John Roberts — may bridge the divide between the five Republicans and four Democrats.

Roberts, in particular, “is very cautious of the institutional credibility of the Court,” said Barry Friedman, a New York University law professor.

By achieving unanimity in major cases that pit religious liberty against civil rights, Republicans against Democrats, and law enforcement efficiency against personal privacy, the Roberts Court showed an ability to reach narrow agreement on topics with clear ideological lines.

The decisions show that Roberts “is working very hard, as apparently are some of the justices, to ensure that the Court doesn’t draw negative attention to itself,” Friedman said.

Not that Roberts’ record reflects this. In his six years on the bench, Roberts has led the Court, often with 5-4 decisions, in a more conservative direction on business, civil rights, and constitutional law. Roberts is not oblivious to the fact that such decisions impact how the public views the Court. In the Citizens United campaign finance decision, Roberts, in damage-control mode, wrote separately to reiterate his commitment to “the important principles of judicial restraint and stare decisis” — or respect for precedent — despite his vote in that case to cast aside past case law.

More: 

Bookmark and Share

Arizona housing experts guarded but hopeful

February 4th, 2012

 

Builders and investors continue to buy land in metro Phoenix in anticipation of the homebuilding market’s recovery

By Catherine Reagor

The Arizona Republic

No one at this year’s Urban Land Institute conference predicted when metro Phoenix’s housing market will rebound.

The annual Arizona conference, where real-estate industry leaders convene and predict the market’s movements, has been the most important summit on Valley real estate since the beginning of the housing boom nearly a decade ago. But this year, the conversations and atmosphere were different.

The many experts who spoke were more low-key and pragmatic than they’d been during the last five years. Few offered any guesses at when home prices might rebound to boom levels.

That may have been because so many past predictions have been wrong.

More

Related:

Economist sees hope for Ariz. recovery 

Bookmark and Share

California’s renewable energy costs are starting to come down

February 4th, 2012

By David R. Baker

San Francisco Chronicle

The price of renewable power contracts signed by California utilities more than doubled from 2003 through 2011 but has now started to plunge, according to a long-awaited state report issued Friday.

The report is the most detailed accounting yet of the costs of California’s push to use more solar, wind and geothermal power. Until now, most of those costs have remained hidden from the public. The California Public Utilities Commission, which issued Friday’s report, has for years published quarterly updates on the number of contracts signed but has never before included the costs.

A state law passed in 2002 and expanded in 2006 required California utilities to get 20 percent of their electricity from renewable sources by the end of 2010, a goal that has since been expanded to 33 percent by 2020. The law set off a scramble among the utilities to sign contracts with companies building wind farms and solar power plants.

As a result, contract prices rose steadily as the deadline loomed, according to Friday’s report. In 2003, the utilities paid an average of 5.4 cents per kilowatt hour for renewable power contracts. By 2011, the average reached 13.3 cents per kilowatt hour.

But it is starting to tumble.

More: 

Bookmark and Share