‘Solar Zone’ Articulates New, World-Class Concept: International Solar Innovation, Collaboration, Growth in One Hot Spot

March 19th, 2010

From Business Week

The “Solar Zone” at the University of Arizona Science & Technology Park is a revolutionary, solar-centric business zone poised to significantly advance solar energy innovation and production. The Solar Zone thrusts Southern Arizona into the center of solar investment.

Far beyond a solar farm’s sea of glinting photovoltaic panels, the Solar Zone is a sweeping integration of research and development, manufacturing, green job training, education and public awareness, according John D. Grabo, director of business development for the UA Tech Park. About 200 of the UA Tech Park’s 1,345 acres, 9000 S. Rita Road, have been designated for the Solar Zone.

“The Solar Zone is the articulation of a vision to bring different aspects of the solar industry together in a supportive and competitive environment to manufacture products, create technology, attract suppliers, nurture talent, and influence the solar strategy of the region,” Grabo said. “A comprehensive, integrated solar park at this level does not exist elsewhere.”

The Solar Zone will connect selected and prequalified research centers internationally and create productive partnerships through The Global AdvantageTMprogram, a network of cities and regions in the United States, Canada and Europe that includes Ottawa and Berlin, committed to working collaboratively on clean-tech initiative that will:

• Create new markets;

• Enhance supply chains;

• Foster research opportunities for technology development and commercialization; and

• Create productive partnerships with relevant solar centers to investment business opportunities for Solar Zone firms.

Location, location, location

Tucson’s 350 days of sunshine make it ripe for solar power innovations. The Solar Zone at the Tech Park offers the ideal setting and several attributes not available elsewhere.

These strategic advantages include:

• Location — 200 acres will cluster multiple solar generation technologies used in the marketplace, combined with next generation product development.

• Synergy — Centralizing key suppliers in the region and state is a fundamental goal.

• Speed to marketplace — The Solar Zone’s streamlined processes combined with an understanding of the competitive challenges and demands helps drive solar companies to operational much faster than anywhere else.

• Talent — The next generation of solar professionals is being developed in collaboration with industry requirements.

• Innovative capacity — The Solar Zone is linked to the University of Arizona, is ranked among the top 20 of public research universities nationwide, and its solar efforts such as the Arizona Research Institute for Solar Energy (AzRISE) and programs in the Optical Sciences, Engineering, Atmospheric Sciences and Physical Sciences.

Outcomes

The Solar Zone’s collaborative approach dovetails with the community’s goals and the University of Arizona’ strong strategic focus on sustainability and renewable energy. Utilities and the research community welcome the Solar Zone’s presence and unique concept. This sweeping innovation is meant to stimulate investment for the solar industry and create a distinct competitive advantage for solar industry investment and jobs.

Grabo expects the Solar Zone to attract power generation and be solar thought leaders. Energy companies, manufacturers of solar panels and other materials, researchers, start-up companies, and educational institutions should be to attracted to the Solar Zone. This is the environment to create, test and deploy current and future solar technologies.

Tucson Electric Power (TEP) is committed to and actively engaged in the direction of the Solar Zone. The Solar Zone’s success will support TEP’s efforts to satisfy Arizona’s Renewable Energy Standard, which calls on the state’s utilities to increase their use of renewable power each year until it represents 15 percent of their retail energy in 2025.

The Solar Zone also will play a key role in deployment of solar energy technology, resulting in the wider acceptance of a solar energy use and driving down costs. The Solar Zone’s demonstration garden and public awareness center will showcase how solar power works, how it can be used and how it helps the environment, will be central to the Solar Zone’s goal of stimulating interest in and awareness of clean energy.   The Solar Zone’s education goal will extend to on-site classrooms where local institutions can develop workforce-training programs with industry input for solar energy-related jobs, such as technicians and installers.

Anchor tenant

The Solar Zone’s first-of-its-kind integration attracted Bell Independent Power Corporation (BIPC) of Rochester, NY, which announced in January that it would be the anchor tenant of the Solar Zone with its state-of-the-art 5-MW Concentrated Solar Power plant with a Thermal Storage System — the first in the world.

BIPC will harvest Tucson’s unique, renewable natural resource: The Heat. Its proprietary Thermal Storage System will enable the concentrated solar power plant to generate electricity on cloudy days and after sunset, reducing cost and overcoming the major limitation of solar power — it only works days. Concentrated solar power gathers the sun’s heat, rather than its light. Photovoltaic arrays at airports and on building rooftops convert solar light photons into electricity.

The impetus for the BIPC project was a TEP request for proposal. TEP has asked the Arizona Corporation Commission to approve its agreement to purchase power from the plant over a 20-year period. The plant is expected begin providing power to the company’s customers in May 2011. Tucson has been supportive and positive of the solar industry.

“We look forward to the community’s continued support through TREO (Tucson Regional Economic Opportunities, Inc.) and its ongoing efforts to attract economic development incentives,” President Joseph Bell, Jr., said when announcing the firm’s decision to locate at the Solar Zone.

The Solar Zone at The Tech Park in Tucson offers a sweeping, integrated approach that will elevate Tucson as a world-leader in development solar power’s prowess and investment potential.

Bookmark and Share

Wind farm could widen in SRP deal

March 19th, 2010

By Ryan Randazzo

The Arizona Republic

Dry Lake Wind Power Project

Salt River Project announced a deal Thursday that could double the size of the state’s only wind farm, the Dry Lake Wind Power Project near Snowflake.

The plant was built last year and sells all its power to SRP, which delivers it to customers in the Valley, and the non-profit, municipal utility said it has agreed to buy power from an expansion to the plant.

Iberdrola Renewables, a Spanish company with U.S. operations based in Portland, Ore., built the first 30 turbines last year and is planning the second, $110 million phase with 31 more turbines that stand 400 feet. The company is seeking permits for the expansion from Navajo County’s planning commission.

“Adding additional wind energy to our resource mix will provide more clean energy for our customers while at the same time helping to increase the overall renewable-energy supply in Arizona,” SRP General Manager Richard Silverman said.

The expansion could have a maximum capacity of 65 megawatts, which in a steady wind will generate enough power to run appliances in 16,000 homes at once.

But the wind doesn’t always blow, and when it does, it’s not always strong enough to get the maximum output from the turbines. Throughout the year, the 31 new turbines should produce about the same amount of electricity that 9,100 homes use in a year, according to SRP.

Rest of story: http://bit.ly/bxmn56

Bookmark and Share

Plans may reduce NE Valley’s reliance on groundwater

March 19th, 2010

By Lynh Bui

The Arizona Republic

Scottsdale and Arizona American Water have been negotiating plans that could reduce the Northeast Valley’s reliance on groundwater and possibly avoid a costly eminent domain battle between the city and the private utility.

Since December, city and utility officials have been hammering out ways to conserve the region’s groundwater. Proposals include a “treat-and-transport” plan that would have the city treating Arizona American Water’s allotment of Central Arizona Project surface water, a renewable resource, to replace pumping groundwater, which is not renewable.

The treat-and-transport plan is not new. It was one piece of a larger proposal from about two years ago to manage water-quality issues related to the North

North Indian Bend Wash

Indian Bend Wash Superfund site and long-term water issues. But everyone involved couldn’t agree, and talks stalled.

In recent months, discussion has been renewed and the parties have made “significant progress” in developing a long-term water-supply solution everyone can be comfortable with, Arizona American Water President Paul Townsley said.

“We’ve been working to put together a solution that actually makes sense for this broader community because whatever any of us do, we’re all interconnected,” Townsley said.

When Townsley says “we,” he’s not talking about only Scottsdale and Arizona American Water; the effort involves Motorola, Paradise Valley, Maricopa County, the Salt River Project, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Rest of story: http://bit.ly/9JY7Fe

Bookmark and Share

Broker’s split leads to untidy scramble

March 19th, 2010

By Dale Quinn

Arizona Daily Star

Despite the decision of the chief executive of a local real estate brokerage to rebrand under a different company, Realty Executives International will continue to have a presence in Tucson.

Anthony Azar, who was the head broker of Realty Executives Southern Arizona, recently decided to rebrand his company under Keller Williams Realty Inc. He said he’s now helping the company’s agents make the switch to the new brand, dubbed Keller Williams Southern Arizona.

About 200 of Realty Executive’s more than 300 agents have expressed interest in making the switch to Keller Williams, Azar said.

The company has its headquarters in Austin, Texas.

But Realty Executives, which was founded in Arizona, has no plans to exit the Tucson market.

Rest of story: http://bit.ly/ayTs3i

Bookmark and Share

Eminent domain law changes clear Senate debate

March 18th, 2010

The state Senate today cleared two eminent domain bills for 3rd read.  The bills are explained in fact sheets that follow.

FACT SHEET FOR S.B. 1365

eminent domain; disclosure; violation

Expands the notice requirement from 20 days to 120 days that a property is subject to condemnation and establishes that a full disclosure statement be included in the notice to the property owner.

Background

Eminent domain is the inherent power of a governmental entity to take privately owned property, especially land, and convert it to public use, subject to reasonable compensation for the taking.  Condemnation is the exercise of eminent domain and is the determination and declaration that certain property be assigned to public use (Black’s Law Dictionary).

In Arizona, the power of eminent domain is authorized by the Arizona Constitution or state statute for many different public bodies, including state government, city, town and county governments, school districts and certain utilities and special taxing districts.  Additionally, both the Arizona Constitution and the United States Constitution guarantee the payment of “just compensation” to the property owner for any private property taken by the government (Article 2, Section 17, Constitution of Arizona; Article V, United States Constitution).

The acquisition of private property generally occurs by way of a lawsuit in which the government agency asks the court to award the government immediate possession of the property and to determine the amount of compensation to be paid to the owner for the property.  In accordance with A.R.S. §12-1116, the governmental entity must deliver a written offer of just compensation to the private property owner. The government plaintiff must also obtain one or more appraisals to support the amount of the proposed compensation for the property.  On completion or settlement of the trial and payment of compensation, the government agency acquires title to the property.

Under current law, the following must be delivered to the property owner in an action for condemnation at least 20 days prior to filing: a) a written offer of just compensation to the property owner; and b) one or more appraisals for the property that support the proposed compensation (A.R.S. § 12-1116).  S.B. 1365 expands the notice timeframe from 20 days to 120 days and adds to the requirement that a full disclosure statement also be delivered to the property owner.

The fiscal impact to the state General Fund is unknown.

Provisions

1.      Expands from 20 days to 120 days the time before filing a condemnation action that the governmental entity must notify the property owner the property is subject to condemnation.

2.      Establishes that a governmental entity in a condemnation action deliver a full disclosure statement in writing to the property owner regarding the final project that includes the identification of all aspects of the work to be performed to complete the project and a risk assessment prepared by an independent risk assessing agent.

3.      Removes a statutory formula for determining assessments regarding certain property portions of a larger parcel subject to condemnation.

4.      Defines just compensation and risk.

5.      Makes technical and conforming changes.

6.      Becomes effective on the general effective date.

FACT SHEET FOR S.B. 1366

AMENDED

eminent domain; relocation assistance

Purpose

Specifies applicable rules for acquiring agencies regarding relocation assistance for displaced persons in eminent domain actions.

Background

Eminent domain  is the inherent power of a governmental entity to take privately owned property, especially land, and convert it to public use, subject to reasonable compensation for the taking.  Condemnation is the exercise of eminent domain and is the determination and declaration that certain property be assigned to public use (Black’s Law Dictionary).

In Arizona, the power of eminent domain is authorized by the Arizona Constitution or state statute for many different public bodies, including state government, city, town and county governments, school districts, certain utilities and special taxing districts.  Additionally, both the Arizona Constitution and the United States Constitution guarantee the payment of “just compensation” to the property owner for any private property taken by the government (Article 2, Section 17, Constitution of Arizona; Article V, United States Constitution).

Acquiring agencies are required to provide relocation services to displaced property owners, including: a) relocation assistance advisory services; b) payment of moving and related expenses; c) expenses incidental to transfer of property; and d) litigation expenses.  The Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) is subject to similar requirements in the event the agency acquires property for transportation purposes.

The fiscal impact to the state General Fund is unknown.

Provisions

1.      Modifies the definition of acquiring agency to include any other person or entity with eminent domain power and includes ADOT in the definition of a displacing agency.

2.      Requires acquiring agencies to adopt rules prescribed in the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition program included in the federal transportation code unless they conflict with the laws of this state.

3.      Provides that in the event of a conflict of laws, which ever law benefits the displaced person prevails.

4.      Makes technical changes.

5.      Becomes effective on the general effective date.

Amendments Adopted by Committee

  • Replaces proposed language regarding relocation assistance requirements in condemnation actions with provisions prescribed in the federal transportation code that are not in conflict with Arizona law.
Bookmark and Share

Brewer takes shot at Goddard in office news release challenging health care reform

March 18th, 2010

GOVERNOR’S OFFICE NEWS RELEASE

Governor Jan Brewer today sent the letter  below to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Majority Leader Harry Reid.  She will coordinate with other state

Gov. Jan Brewer

attorneys general on behalf  Arizona to legally challenge the president’s health care bill.  Despite the enormous fiscal impacts to the state, Arizona’s attorney general has not yet made public his position on the massive federal entitlement expansion.

March 17, 2010

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi

Speaker, United States House of Representatives

Washington, DC 20515

The Honorable Harry Reid

Majority Leader, United States Senate

Washington, DC 20510

Dear Speaker Pelosi & Majority Leader Reid:

On December 30, 2009, the Attorneys General from several states wrote you expressing grave concerns about the Senate version of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (H.R. 3590).  Although amendments have been made to this bill since then, the primary constitutional defects remain.  It is reported that Democratic Congressional leaders intend to move forward with legislation that uses this bill as its starting point.  I therefore, on behalf of the State of Arizona, join these Attorneys General and urge you to reject H.R. 3590 and any legislation that contains similar legal deficiencies.

As Governor and the statutory officer authorized to communicate with Congress on behalf of the State of Arizona, I have contacted Arizona’s delegation on more than one occasion expressing my serious policy concerns with H.R. 3590.  Last week I wrote President Obama and told him quite clearly that Arizona simply cannot afford the unfunded mandate that will result from this legislation and outlined the disproportionate impact it will have on Arizona citizens.

The devastating impacts of the federal legislation will rob Arizonans of their rights and pocketbooks alike. One of the core principles of our nation’s system of government is the critical balance between the power of the federal government and the protection of individual liberties.  The constitutional framers granted Congress only certain enumerated powers and provided that all other powers are reserved to the states or the people pursuant to the Tenth Amendment.

H.R. 3590 represents a sweeping violation of these fundamental principles established by the founding fathers.  By requiring all citizens to purchase health insurance or be penalized, this bill would impose on the people an unprecedented mandate by the federal government.  As emphasized by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office:

“The government has never required people to buy any good or service as a condition of lawful residence in the United States.”  This mandate violates the founders’ intent to limit the intrusion of the federal government upon the rights of the individual.

The Commerce Clause is erroneously cited as a legitimate basis for Congress to impose the requirement to purchase insurance.  As you are aware, the congressional power to regulate commerce is not without limits.  The sole basis for claiming constitutional authority under the Commerce Clause is seemingly derived by coercing Americans to engage in commerce through the purchase of insurance and then regulating that coerced transaction.  Even the non-partisan and independent Congressional Research Service raised serious concerns about the constitutionality of this proposal, noting that it may very well go beyond the bounds of the Commerce Clause.

I must also strenuously object to the benefit exchanges the proposed legislation would impose upon states.  H.R. 3590 requires states to either enact state legislation and regulations to implement these exchanges or be forced to allow the Secretary of Health and Human Services to take over and do it for them.  This requirement is not a condition to receive federal funding, but rather an absolute mandate to the states in direct contravention of the Tenth Amendment.

For the foregoing reasons, I will coordinate with the other State Attorneys General on behalf of the State of Arizona to challenge H.R. 3590 or any health care proposal that becomes law with any of the unconstitutional provisions I have outlined in this letter.  Thank you on behalf of the citizens of Arizona for your consideration of these matters.

Sincerely,

Janice K. Brewer

Governor

JKB/jk

cc:       The Honorable Henry McMaster, South Carolina Attorney General

Bookmark and Share