Litigation
Unfortunately, problems occur that cannot be resolved with a business-oriented solution. Rose Law Group pc’s litigation department complements our other areas of practice by providing practical, business-oriented advice and options to get your business to a sound solution even when litigation occurs.
Litigation is time-consuming and expensive and we will help you explore your options for quick escalation. However, if your problem requires an aggressive effective resolution through the courts our attorneys are prepared.
On Our Team
In The News
Is an electronic signature valid?
By Loren Ungar | Rose Law Group Attorney The World is well on course to become totally digital. Many businesses are paper-less and even more homes have gone the same route. It’s easier, quicker and the environmentally friendly decision to make but many more grey areas are coming to light including the validity of an electronic signature. Is your electronic
Courts Disagree on Federal Preemption of “Organic” Labeling; Chair of Rose Law Group Class Action Department, Kathryn Honecker discusses
By Erin Louise Palmer | American Bar Association Federal law does not preempt state law claims challenging “organic” labeling of food and body care products, according to Segedie v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. In Segedie, the district court held that the Organic Foods Production Act of 1990 (OFPA) and the National Organic Program (NOP) regulations preempt California and New York
Rose Law Group Litigation Attorney Evan Bolick for ‘Record Reporter,’ Duty and defiance: Davis’ dangerous flouting of the law
Read the full article with a subscription Evan Bolick can be reached at ebolick@roselawgroup.com
Rose Law Group Litigators Loren Ungar and Evan Bolick argue for client Former Senate President Russell Pearce before the 9th Circuit
Rose Law Group is representing former Senate President Russell Pearce in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals from an appeal from a decision in Pearce’s favor. The petitioner is contending that former Senator Pearce took unconstitutional action in 2011 when he banned the petitioner from the Senate building for two-weeks because he was identified as having engaged in disruptive behavior
Have a Legal Question?
Call us today at 480.505.3936 or contact us via email by clicking here.
