By Elizabeth Whitman | Phoenix New Times Several Arizona Supreme Court justices appeared to favor medical-marijuana extracts during oral arguments on Tuesday in a case that could determine the future of medical marijuana in this state. The case, State of Arizona v. Rodney Christopher Jones, questions the scope of the 2010 Arizona Medical Marijuana Act and the issue of whether it …
By Jeff Jeffrey | Phoenix Business Journal Washington’s political rancor is rippling across the nation’s real estate industry, as the recent federal shutdown has delayed a plan to unleash trillions in property investment in the country’s biggest cities and most impoverished communities. Specifically, the delay has affected new rules for investing in so-called Opportunity Zones, and in the process has …
By Alexander Casey | Zillow Sale prices ticked up sharply in some of the nation’s lowest-income and highest-poverty communities near the end of last year—but mostly in the neighborhoods now eligible for newly created tax breaks. Tucked within the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) is a somewhat overlooked, but potentially massive, program: Opportunity Zones. Investors have flocked to these …
Tracking the genesis of California’s choice-of-law analysis, the current state of the law, and how that analysis ought to apply in the relatively new realm of e-commerce cases. By Jonathan Udell | ABA The ancient Roman author Publius Syrus once wrote, “Divide the fire, and you will the sooner put it out.” As all class-action practitioners know, strength comes in …
Next time you’re presented with a potential multi-state case, consider using one or more of these strategies. By Jonathan Udell | ABA Many people think a class including consumers from multiple states all pursuing claims under California’s consumer-protection laws is not certifiable followingMazza v. American Honda Motor Company, 666 F.3d 581 (9th Cir. 2012). But that may not be true. …
By Kathryn Honecker and Mark E. Rooney | ABA Many people think a class including consumers from multiple states all pursuing claims under California’s consumer-protection laws is not certifiable followingMazza v. American Honda Motor Company, 666 F.3d 581 (9th Cir. 2012). But that may not be true. READ ON:
Disclosure: Rose Law Group represents Virtua Partners in some of their properties By Jim Tankersley |The New York Times A hotel groundbreaking ceremony here in an old cotton field not far from Interstate 10 last month featured two United States senators, a hot catered lunch and a stream of speeches about driving economic investment to this corner of the Southwest that …
As reported by the Phoenix Business Journal, Rose Law Group is among the top 29 largest lobbying firms in Arizona. To view the full list click below:
Disclosure: Rose Law Group represents the Phoenix Rising By Jake Anderson | Arizona Sports Phoenix Rising FC and Casino Arizona have entered a multi-year contract agreement for the naming rights of Phoenix Rising Sports Complex, the team announced Friday. “It is a great honor for Phoenix Rising to partner with Casino Arizona, an iconic entertainment destination in the Valley,” said Berke …
Disclosure: Rose Law Group represents TR Surprise By Jason Stone | YourValley.net It won’t exactly be the old “Dodgertown” in Vero Beach, Florida, but the Texas Rangers will still have something unique when they open their own housing facility next spring in Surprise. The Surprise City Council last week approved construction of the team’s housing complex across from Surprise Stadium, 15930 N. …
Rose Law Group has three office locations to better serve our clients. You can reach us anytime at 480.505.3936 or via email by clicking here. Click the map/address below to access the Google Map for each respective location and for additional location assistance, don’t hesitate to contact us.
7144 E. Stetson Drive, Suite 300, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 | 480.505.3936 | info@roselawgroup.com
© 2025 Rose Law Group, pc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy
