Dan is a member of Rose Law Group’s Real Estate Transactions, Business and Corporate Transactions and Litigation practice groups. Dan’s practice consists on a range of real estate and business matters, including commercial and residential transactions, syndication, acquisition and development, financing and strategic planning.
Dan is experienced with utilizing tax incentives in real estate and business transactions, and in particular with respect to forming and structuring Qualified Opportunity Funds for investment in Qualified Opportunity Zones.
Dan is passionate about giving back to the community. Previously, Dan coordinated a pro bono program at a large legal non-profit that assisted over 4,000 indigent Arizonans each year.
Dan is a graduate of the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University, where he was a Pedrick Scholar and an articles editor of Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science, and Technology. He is the founder and former president of the American Constitution Society, ASU Chapter and the former president of the ASU Disability Law Project. Dan earned his bachelor’s degree in psychology from the University of Arizona.
In his free time he enjoys cooking, cycling, and playing board games.
Second round of O-Zone guidance provides ‘much-needed answers,’ says Dan Gauthier, Rose Law Group transactional attorney handling many Opportunity Zone investments
Treasury, IRS create flexibility to position incentive for success. By Christine Serlin | MFE The Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service +
Has the question about leases been answered in the new O-Zone guidance? Dan Gauthier, Rose Law Group transactional attorney handling many Opportunity Zone investments, answers
By Dan Gauthier, Rose Law Group Has the question about leases been answered in the new Opportunity Zone guidance? The +
What question remains after opportunity Zone guidance? Dan Gauthier, Rose Law Group transactional attorney handling many Opportunity Zone investments, provides his take
By Dan Gauthier, Rose Law Group What is a question that the new Opportunity Zone guidance has not yet addressed +